Pig World
  • News
      • Animal Health
      • Breeding
      • Business
      • Environment
      • EU
      • Food Safety
      • Housing
      • Marketing
      • NPA
      • National Pig Awards
      • New Products
      • Nutrition
      • People
      • Pig Fair
      • Politics
      • Training & Education
      • Welfare
  • Features
    • Animal Health
    • Breeding
    • Environment
    • Farm Visits
    • Herd Recording
    • Housing
    • Marketing
    • Nutrition
    • Products
    • Training
  • Comment
    • AHDB Pork
    • Chris Fogden
    • Dennis Bridgeford
    • Peter Crichton
    • Red Robin
    • Veterinary View
    • Zoe Davies, NPA
  • Numbers
  • Pig Prices
  • Magazines
    • July 2025
    • June 2025
    • 2025 Innovation supplement
    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • 2025 Buildings supplement
    • February 2025
    • 2025 Nutrition Supplement
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • 2025 National Pig Awards supplement
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • August 2024
    • 2024 Pig Health supplement
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    • 2024 Innovation supplement
    • 2024 Pig & Poultry Fair Guide
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • 2024 Buildings Supplement
    • March 2024
    • 2024 Pig Nutrition supplement
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • 2023 National Pig Awards supplement
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • Health Supplement
  • Suppliers
  • Jobs
    • Browse Jobs
    • Post a Job
    • Manage Jobs
  • Classified
  • Events
    • Pigs Tomorrow
    • National Pig Awards
Podcast
Pig WorldPig World
  • News
      • Animal Health
      • Breeding
      • Business
      • Environment
      • EU
      • Food Safety
      • Housing
      • Marketing
      • NPA
      • National Pig Awards
      • New Products
      • Nutrition
      • People
      • Pig Fair
      • Politics
      • Training & Education
      • Welfare
  • Features
    • Animal Health
    • Breeding
    • Environment
    • Farm Visits
    • Herd Recording
    • Housing
    • Marketing
    • Nutrition
    • Products
    • Training
  • Comment
    • AHDB Pork
    • Chris Fogden
    • Dennis Bridgeford
    • Peter Crichton
    • Red Robin
    • Veterinary View
    • Zoe Davies, NPA
  • Numbers
  • Pig Prices
  • Magazines
    1. July 2025
    2. June 2025
    3. 2025 Innovation supplement
    4. May 2025
    5. April 2025
    6. March 2025
    7. 2025 Buildings supplement
    8. February 2025
    9. 2025 Nutrition Supplement
    10. January 2025
    11. December 2024
    12. November 2024
    13. 2025 National Pig Awards supplement
    14. October 2024
    15. September 2024
    16. August 2024
    17. 2024 Pig Health supplement
    18. July 2024
    19. June 2024
    20. 2024 Innovation supplement
    21. 2024 Pig & Poultry Fair Guide
    22. May 2024
    23. April 2024
    24. 2024 Buildings Supplement
    25. March 2024
    26. 2024 Pig Nutrition supplement
    27. February 2024
    28. January 2024
    29. December 2023
    30. November 2023
    31. 2023 National Pig Awards supplement
    32. October 2023
    33. September 2023
    34. Health Supplement
    Featured

    July 2025 issue of Pig World now available

    July 6, 2025
    Recent

    July 2025 issue of Pig World now available

    July 6, 2025

    June 2025 issue of Pig World now available

    June 4, 2025

    2025 Innovation supplement now available

    June 4, 2025
  • Suppliers
  • Jobs
    • Browse Jobs
    • Post a Job
    • Manage Jobs
  • Classified
  • Events
    • Pigs Tomorrow
    • National Pig Awards
LinkedIn X (Twitter)
Pig World
News

Cranswick application for large pig and poultry unit in Norfolk rejected

Alistair DriverBy Alistair DriverApril 3, 20255 Mins Read
LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Email
Cranswick planning proposal
© Cranswick

Cranswick said it was considering its options after King’s Lynn & West Norfolk Borough Council Planning Committee unanimously rejected its application for a large pig and poultry unit in Norfolk. 

After a three-year process that encountered various delays and generated huge opposition, Cranswick had been seeking permission to expand an existing site to house 14,000 pigs and 714,000 chickens near the villages of Methwold and Feltwell.

Following the three-hour hearing, a Cranswick spokesperson said: “We are incredibly disappointed by today’s decision. This a bad day for the sustainable production of British meat. We’ll now take time to review the decision and consider the options available to us.”

NGOs that had campaigned against the development described it as a ‘landmark decision’, however. Sustain and Feedback said failure to include information on full direct and indirect greenhouse gas emissions in the application was considered grounds for rejection by the council’s planning experts, in what will be ‘a significant boost for climate campaigners but a damning indictment for UK megafarms’.

Lily O’Mara, Climate Campaigner at Sustain, said: “Local authorities are waking up to the reality of industrial farming: a damaging and extractive system of food production that poses a serious threat to human health and our country’s future, both economically and environmentally.

“King’s Lynn and West Norfolk Council has rightly put nature and communities first by saying no to a development that would have sent us in completely the wrong direction.”

Jake White, head of legal advocacy at the WWF, said: “This is a well-deserved win, not just for the environment but for the local community who united to oppose this unpopular, unlawful and unsustainable megafarm.

“We are delighted that the people of Methwold have got the result they wanted following the council’s robust consultation process.”

Terry Jermy, the MP for South West Norfolk who had vocally campaigned against the development, called it a ‘victory for local people and the environment’, Lynn News reported.

“I said from the beginning, no ifs, no buts, the megafarm should not go ahead and I am delighted that the application has been rejected. With over 15,000 objections and numerous of legal concerns raised based on environmental breaches this is an important victory,” he said.

A borough council spokesperson said: “Our role in determining this application is to ensure that the planning process is conducted professionally, objectively and thoroughly, and we are confident that this is what has happened today.

“We thank all parties involved, in particular the members of our planning team and our planning committee, for their careful analysis and consideration of the issues, to help us reach this decision.”

Uphill battle

Cranswick was always facing an uphill battle to win the day, after planning officers recommended that the application should be refused, in a 200-page report published in March.

With the site lying close to a number of European protected sites, the report said Cranswick had failed to demonstrate that the development ‘would not result in significant adverse effects on the protected sites’.

They also concluded that insufficient environmental information had been submitted to enable the council to reach a view on the impact of the project on the environment and climate change.

The report stated: “The public benefits of the development as proposed are outweighed by the potential environmental impacts of the scheme. The Council are not in a position to fully assess these impacts, despite the number of opportunities presented to the Applicant to submit further information, and as such the application should be refused.”

Cranswick hit back, issuing a robust response that was heavily critical of the council in its statement to the planning committee.

It reiterated its arguments that the development would ensure better use of local land, improving the existing site, which currently permitted by the Environment Agency to house 29,000 pigs; deliver higher welfare for pigs and poultry and improve British food security, reducing the country’s reliance on imports.

Cranswick refuted the ‘mega farm’ tag, pointing out that the pigs, for example, would be housed in 14 straw-based buildings similar to those used across the country.

It said the application was about producing more British food, to higher welfare standards, through the redevelopment of existing farms. The renovated site would produce 0.5% of the pigs, and 0.5% of the chickens, reared in the UK.

“At a time of rising prices, trade wars and escalating international tensions, now is the time Britain needs to produce more food at home, using modern, efficient and sustainable forms of farming,” it said in its final briefing to the planning committee.

“Not doing so will have a detrimental impact on UK economic growth, on food prices for consumers locally and nationally, and on direct and indirect employment opportunities, within Norfolk and across the wider UK.”

Cranswick said it ‘fully recognised that a range of concerns and views have been expressed by local stakeholders and residents’, and had worked hard to address the issues.

But, with reports that the proposal received around 15,000 objections, alongside a handful of submissions in support, Cranswick claimed that 90% of the objections came from outside the local area, defined as a 10km radius around the site, with many from outside the UK, including Rome, Lisbon, Calgary and California.

Share. LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Email
Previous ArticleCranswick claims 90% of objections to its Norfolk planning proposal are from outside the area
Next Article April 2025 issue of Pig World now available
Alistair Driver

Editor Pig World, group editor Agronomist and Arable Farmer and Farm Contractor. National Pig Association webmaster. Former political editor at Farmers Guardian. Occasional media pundit. Brought up on a Leicestershire farm. Works from a shed in his Oxfordshire garden.

Read Similar Stories

ABN kicks off pioneering long-term mill project

July 11, 2025

Red Tractor to press ahead with new tiers for outdoor pig producers

July 10, 2025

Last chance to enter or nominate for 2025 National Pig Awards

July 10, 2025
Latest News

ABN kicks off pioneering long-term mill project

July 11, 2025

Red Tractor to press ahead with new tiers for outdoor pig producers

July 10, 2025

Last chance to enter or nominate for 2025 National Pig Awards

July 10, 2025
Sponsored Content

THE GATEKEEPER OF RESPIRATORY HEALTH – MYCOPLASMA HYOPNEUMONIAE (M.HYO)

April 30, 2024

Tackle the root cause of PWD with free diagnostic tests

March 1, 2024
Current Pig Industry jobs
  • Senior-Level Pig Stockperson – Ref 1760 Hampshire

    • Hampshire
    • Roadhogs Recruitment Ltd.
    • Full Time
  • Pig Stockperson – Ref 1759 North Yorkshire

    • North Yorkshire
    • Roadhogs Recruitment Ltd.
    • Full Time
  • Pig Stockperson – Ref 1758 Norfolk

    • Norfolk
    • Roadhogs Recruitment Ltd.
    • Full Time
GETTING IN TOUCH
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Meet The Editors
  • About Us
  • Email Newsletters
  • Subscribe
  • Reuse permissions
OUR SOCIAL CHANNELS
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
PARTNER EVENTS
RELATED SITES
  • Farmers Weekly
  • Agronomist & Arable Farmer
  • Farm Contractor
  • National Pig Awards
  • Pigs Tomorrow
  • Poultry News
  • Weekly Tribune
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
© 2024 MA Agriculture Ltd, a Mark Allen Group company

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.