Pig World
  • News
      • Animal Health
      • Breeding
      • Business
      • Environment
      • EU
      • Food Safety
      • Housing
      • Marketing
      • NPA
      • National Pig Awards
      • New Products
      • Nutrition
      • People
      • Pig Fair
      • Politics
      • Training & Education
      • Welfare
  • Features
    • Animal Health
    • Breeding
    • Environment
    • Farm Visits
    • Herd Recording
    • Housing
    • Marketing
    • Nutrition
    • Products
    • Training
  • Comment
    • AHDB Pork
    • Chris Fogden
    • Dennis Bridgeford
    • Peter Crichton
    • Red Robin
    • Veterinary View
    • Zoe Davies, NPA
  • Numbers
  • Pig Prices
  • Magazines
    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • 2025 Buildings supplement
    • February 2025
    • 2025 Nutrition Supplement
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • National Pig Awards supplement
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • August 2024
    • 2024 Pig Health supplement
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    • Innovation supplement 2024
    • Pig & Poultry Fair Guide 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • Buildings Supplement
    • March 2024
    • Pig Nutrition (Beyond Zinc)
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • National Pig Awards Supplement 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • Health Supplement
  • Suppliers
  • Jobs
    • Browse Jobs
    • Post a Job
    • Manage Jobs
  • Classified
  • Events
    • Pigs Tomorrow
    • National Pig Awards
Podcast
Pig WorldPig World
  • News
      • Animal Health
      • Breeding
      • Business
      • Environment
      • EU
      • Food Safety
      • Housing
      • Marketing
      • NPA
      • National Pig Awards
      • New Products
      • Nutrition
      • People
      • Pig Fair
      • Politics
      • Training & Education
      • Welfare
  • Features
    • Animal Health
    • Breeding
    • Environment
    • Farm Visits
    • Herd Recording
    • Housing
    • Marketing
    • Nutrition
    • Products
    • Training
  • Comment
    • AHDB Pork
    • Chris Fogden
    • Dennis Bridgeford
    • Peter Crichton
    • Red Robin
    • Veterinary View
    • Zoe Davies, NPA
  • Numbers
  • Pig Prices
  • Magazines
    1. May 2025
    2. April 2025
    3. March 2025
    4. 2025 Buildings supplement
    5. February 2025
    6. 2025 Nutrition Supplement
    7. January 2025
    8. December 2024
    9. November 2024
    10. National Pig Awards supplement
    11. October 2024
    12. September 2024
    13. August 2024
    14. 2024 Pig Health supplement
    15. July 2024
    16. June 2024
    17. Innovation supplement 2024
    18. Pig & Poultry Fair Guide 2024
    19. May 2024
    20. April 2024
    21. Buildings Supplement
    22. March 2024
    23. Pig Nutrition (Beyond Zinc)
    24. February 2024
    25. January 2024
    26. December 2023
    27. November 2023
    28. National Pig Awards Supplement 2023
    29. October 2023
    30. September 2023
    31. Health Supplement
    Featured

    May 2025 issue of Pig World now available

    May 1, 2025
    Recent

    May 2025 issue of Pig World now available

    May 1, 2025

    April 2025 issue of Pig World now available

    April 4, 2025

    March 2025 issue of Pig World now available

    March 6, 2025
  • Suppliers
  • Jobs
    • Browse Jobs
    • Post a Job
    • Manage Jobs
  • Classified
  • Events
    • Pigs Tomorrow
    • National Pig Awards
LinkedIn X (Twitter)
Pig World
Building Supplement 2021

The farrowing crate conundrum

PW ReportersBy PW ReportersMarch 4, 20217 Mins Read
LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Email

Nick MacIvor, a consultant for AM Warkup, outlines his thoughts on the development of farrowing systems over the years, and why the industry needs clarity to inform future decisions.

During these times of confinement my thoughts have turned to the pig industry’s hottest confinement story.

The development of farrowing systems is one of the most complex because of the overarching requirement to square the needs of the mother sow with those of the piglet. To understand where we are currently we have to understand where we have been.

My first observed farrowing took place in a straw-covered solid floored pen with state-of-the-art anti-crush bars round the walls. The large white sow had seven born and four survived to be weaned at eight weeks. It was 1960.

Last November, I visited a farrowing house with 30 sows in a batch. Each batch was in a fully-slatted, environmentally-controlled room, each sow confined in a farrowing crate for 27 days from birth to weaning. The batch averaged just under 14 piglets per sow weaned, each weighing on average almost the same as their 1960 counterparts.

Nick Maclvor
Nick Maclvor

You may feel that is not a fair comparison and I admit it is rather selective, but remember that a top class indoor unit then would produce 12-15 pigs per sow per year, and today, more than twice as many. Although the sow remained unconfined, systems such as the Solari pen, a mono-pitched box with a rear creep area, proved popular for a while.

The late-60’s saw further developments, including early farrowing houses. Two longitudinal nests flanked a central narrow box which restrained the sow, all in plywood and arranged in rows with access passages front and rear for feeding and cleaning.

Steel bars soon replaced the plywood, giving greater visibility, and the crate in a pen, the crate for the sow and the pen for the piglets, soon followed.

That principle, many times refined, still holds today. Some of the refinements represented major steps forward. Slats behind the sow, the cold side slat to catch the piglets’ dunging habit and then, finally, fully-slatted systems with integrated heat mats.

Farrowing crates also evolved – the Ritchie crate and its successor the NPD floating rail crate, still the most popular today, and its complex competitor the Proctor hydraulic crate, all claimed good teat presentation. The finger bar crate, with its vertical fingers has been an alternative throughout.

Ever-changing improvements in the genetic capability of the sow to produce more piglets with improving viability meant it was increasingly important to improve the total nutritional intake of the sow.

Automatic feed dispensing with wet or dry feed could and often did over-face the sow, thus suppressing appetite, with sour or stale food the result. The individual trough mounted sensor for wet feeding and, for dry feed, the simple sow-operated wheel dispenser or the more expensive, but highly effective, Gestal system, addressed these problems.

These solutions, along with easy-to-wash and clean buildings with effective environments could now keep pace with the sows’ and the industry’s increasing demands.

New solutions

The story to that point is linear and straightforward. Except that it wasn’t like that at all. The line meandered somewhat, with farrowing equipment and layout reflecting, from time to time, attempts to address that tension between the pigs’ ‘ideal’ requirements and commercial imperative.

Ikadan’s spring-loaded plastic mushrooms
Ikadan’s spring-loaded
plastic mushrooms

Hardly a Pig Fair passed without new solutions, ranging from the clever to the bizarre, being showcased. I recall the years the concrete farrowing nest from the now defunct Beacon Trailers won the New Equipment Award and Ikadan’s spring loaded giant plastic mushrooms, controlling the sows lying position didn’t.

Some equipment relied on outstanding stock people for acceptable results. The farrowing nest, which harked back to the early farrowing boxes but without the sows being restrained, required almost constant monitoring and attendance.

Outdoor units seemed to show less ingenuity, relying mainly on the farrowing ark, sometimes with anti-crush rails and occasionally with a creep area. The main emphasis was on improving insulation and longevity.

One exception was the demountable, four-place outdoor farrowing boxes, complete with crates, creeps and surrounds on an early commercial outdoor unit on the Breckland.

In addition, I know of one attempt, at least, to marry outdoor farrowing arks with an essentially indoor unit, when Paul Wright developed a farrowing ‘village’ at Bishop Burton College pig unit. Both generated considerable interest but had limited commercial success.

A conventional fully slatted layout with a side opening crate but for easy loading only
A conventional fully slatted layout with a side opening crate but for easy loading only

Differences have developed between crate configuration in the UK and the rest of Europe. The crate with various degrees of slant and one or both sides openable is common everywhere in mainland Europe, but not here. Although the side opening crate option is readily available in the UK, it is still currently less popular. This may change with possible alterations to legislation.

The future?

So what does the future hold?

I feel the number one problem is uncertainty. I detect from colleagues and farmers that an uncertain future is both deeply worrying and commercially unacceptable.

The pig industry supplies quality food through good times and bad, often in the face of unfair and uninformed criticism. History also informs us that what happens in other countries is not necessarily a good indicator of what happens here. We have the added uncertainty of our largest customers applying different imperatives to ours.

Farrowing systems are undeniably under the spotlight and time is not on our side. We need to keep searching for a solution to serve the best interests of both sow and piglets.

We need solutions which are adoptable, practical and will not kill off another proportion of our production capability. In the UK we already have a wider choice of production methods than most.

We do not lack for well-researched systems and equipment. Pig-Safe developed and trialled by teams led at Scottish Colleges by Emma Baxter and Newcastle University by Sandra Edwards have attracted world-wide interest and some commercial uptake.

The 360 system, the work of Martin Barker and his team at Midland Pig Producers, has taken the idea of confining the sow for a short period whilst farrowing and a few days following but put it on the footprint of a conventional crate area. The crate is opened after the initial high overlying risk is over.

Both claim free farrowing credentials whilst having very different space requirements. Seven square metres plus of the former contrasts markedly with the four and a half of the 360.

If we took the 6.5m requirement announced for new builds in Germany, where would the 360 sit? Other companies, including Warkup, have developed their own solutions.

I would maintain that none of these systems are right or wrong, but are viable options, worthy of consideration.

In practical terms, most in our industry recognises the need for adequate space but, to return to a currently popular phrase – it must be based on the science. Any changes must also have a sufficiently generous adoption period to maintain business viability.

The NPA has already eloquently addressed and presented the issues surrounding the farrowing crate. In their briefing document to Lord Goldsmith, they have cited instances of farmers making building decisions based on supply contracts which were subsequently withdrawn.

This is not new and has happened before causing frustration and justifiable anger for relatively few. Ominously, this and the previous instance both concerned farrowing ‘rules’.

The problem this time is that decisions will be made affecting the whole industry. Future-proofing farrowing accommodation will, without clear guidance, lead to confusion and mistakes.

Farmers are looking for clear guidance to inform current and future decisions. As guardians of the wellbeing of their animals they are endlessly resilient at squaring genuine welfare with commercial imperatives.

They are aware that nothing ever stands still and that change is inevitable. On this most important issue, sense has to prevail with a workable mix of flexibility and aspiration, representing the best outcomes for both sow and piglet- and a roadmap is urgently needed and soon.

Birth is never completely stress free for mother and young. In this age, when we so often attempt to imprint human feelings and values on animal behaviour, we must remember what the real issues are and what freedom really means.

  • Main picture shows a free farrowing system. 
Share. LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Email
Previous ArticleBoost for pork exports as US suspends retaliatory Airbus tariffs
Next Article NPA urges Defra to reject ‘unscientific’ transport proposals
PW Reporters

Read Similar Stories

Pig World – Innovation Supplement – May 2021

May 11, 2021

Pig World – Buildings Supplement – March 2021

March 5, 2021

How freedom farrowing systems can benefit pigs and farmers

March 5, 2021
Latest News

UK livestock sectors urged to take part in survey on vaccine availability

May 14, 2025

APHA to use genomics to boost disease surveillance in £10m project

May 13, 2025

AHDB and Livetec join forces to stage ASF contingency planning workshops

May 12, 2025
Sponsored Content

THE GATEKEEPER OF RESPIRATORY HEALTH – MYCOPLASMA HYOPNEUMONIAE (M.HYO)

April 30, 2024

Tackle the root cause of PWD with free diagnostic tests

March 1, 2024
Current Pig Industry jobs
  • Pig Stockperson – Ref 1738 Co. Fermanagh

    • County Fermanagh
    • Roadhogs Recruitment Ltd.
    • Full Time
  • Pig Stockperson – Ref 1737 Shropshire

    • Shropshire
    • Roadhogs Recruitment Ltd.
    • Full Time
  • Managing Director

    • Oxfordshire and North Yorkshire
    • United Pig Co-operative (UPC)
GETTING IN TOUCH
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Meet The Editors
  • About Us
  • Email Newsletters
  • Subscribe
  • Reuse permissions
OUR SOCIAL CHANNELS
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
PARTNER EVENTS
RELATED SITES
  • Farmers Weekly
  • Agronomist & Arable Farmer
  • Farm Contractor
  • National Pig Awards
  • Pigs Tomorrow
  • Poultry News
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
© 2024 MA Agriculture Ltd, a Mark Allen Group company

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.