Pig World
  • News
      • Animal Health
      • Breeding
      • Business
      • Environment
      • EU
      • Food Safety
      • Housing
      • Marketing
      • NPA
      • National Pig Awards
      • New Products
      • Nutrition
      • People
      • Pig Fair
      • Politics
      • Training & Education
      • Welfare
  • Features
    • Animal Health
    • Breeding
    • Environment
    • Farm Visits
    • Herd Recording
    • Housing
    • Marketing
    • Nutrition
    • Products
    • Training
  • Comment
    • AHDB Pork
    • Chris Fogden
    • Dennis Bridgeford
    • Peter Crichton
    • Red Robin
    • Veterinary View
    • Zoe Davies, NPA
  • Numbers
  • Pig Prices
  • Magazines
    • June 2025
    • 2025 Innovation supplement
    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • 2025 Buildings supplement
    • February 2025
    • 2025 Nutrition Supplement
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • 2025 National Pig Awards supplement
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • August 2024
    • 2024 Pig Health supplement
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    • 2024 Innovation supplement
    • 2024 Pig & Poultry Fair Guide
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • 2024 Buildings Supplement
    • March 2024
    • 2024 Pig Nutrition supplement
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • 2023 National Pig Awards supplement
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • Health Supplement
  • Suppliers
  • Jobs
    • Browse Jobs
    • Post a Job
    • Manage Jobs
  • Classified
  • Events
    • Pigs Tomorrow
    • National Pig Awards
Podcast
Pig WorldPig World
  • News
      • Animal Health
      • Breeding
      • Business
      • Environment
      • EU
      • Food Safety
      • Housing
      • Marketing
      • NPA
      • National Pig Awards
      • New Products
      • Nutrition
      • People
      • Pig Fair
      • Politics
      • Training & Education
      • Welfare
  • Features
    • Animal Health
    • Breeding
    • Environment
    • Farm Visits
    • Herd Recording
    • Housing
    • Marketing
    • Nutrition
    • Products
    • Training
  • Comment
    • AHDB Pork
    • Chris Fogden
    • Dennis Bridgeford
    • Peter Crichton
    • Red Robin
    • Veterinary View
    • Zoe Davies, NPA
  • Numbers
  • Pig Prices
  • Magazines
    1. June 2025
    2. 2025 Innovation supplement
    3. May 2025
    4. April 2025
    5. March 2025
    6. 2025 Buildings supplement
    7. February 2025
    8. 2025 Nutrition Supplement
    9. January 2025
    10. December 2024
    11. November 2024
    12. 2025 National Pig Awards supplement
    13. October 2024
    14. September 2024
    15. August 2024
    16. 2024 Pig Health supplement
    17. July 2024
    18. June 2024
    19. 2024 Innovation supplement
    20. 2024 Pig & Poultry Fair Guide
    21. May 2024
    22. April 2024
    23. 2024 Buildings Supplement
    24. March 2024
    25. 2024 Pig Nutrition supplement
    26. February 2024
    27. January 2024
    28. December 2023
    29. November 2023
    30. 2023 National Pig Awards supplement
    31. October 2023
    32. September 2023
    33. Health Supplement
    Featured

    June 2025 issue of Pig World now available

    June 4, 2025
    Recent

    June 2025 issue of Pig World now available

    June 4, 2025

    2025 Innovation supplement now available

    June 4, 2025

    May 2025 issue of Pig World now available

    May 1, 2025
  • Suppliers
  • Jobs
    • Browse Jobs
    • Post a Job
    • Manage Jobs
  • Classified
  • Events
    • Pigs Tomorrow
    • National Pig Awards
LinkedIn X (Twitter)
Pig World
Farm assurance

Far-reaching review aims to fundamentally change farm assurance landscape

Alistair DriverBy Alistair DriverFebruary 13, 20257 Mins Read
LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Email
Rural landscape
© Adobe Stock

The first UK-wide review of farm assurance runs close to 200 pages and delivers a detailed assessment of the state of farm assurance schemes in the UK.

There is a lot to digest, but the overarching conclusion is that farm assurance, across the 12 schemes covered, is not delivering on its remit and ‘fundamental changes’ are needed to address growing frustration among farmers about how it is delivered.

The review was established by the UK farming unions and AHDB last year in the wake of the widespread anger over Red Tractor’s attempt to introduce a Greener Farms Commitment (GFC).

Conducted independently by four commissioners – lead commissioner Dr David Llewellyn, the former Harper Adams University vice-chancellor; Mark Suthern; Katrina Williams; and James Withers – the nine-month review collected evidence from across the UK food supply chain.

The question for all involved now – the schemes, their users and representative bodies and, in some cases, government – is whether the report’s far-reaching recommendations can be turned into meaningful change.

What is farm assurance for?

The review report grappled with the difficult question of the purpose of farm assurance and who it is for, highlighting ‘diametrically opposed’ views on it in different parts of the supply chain.

“The lack of agreement on what farm assurance really stands for goes right to the heart of the challenges faced by the system in the UK,” the report observed.

For retailers, it is often seen as a ‘necessary cost of doing business’, and a means of finding out about the safety and other attributes of the products they source.

For farmers, the view is much more mixed. A high percentage believes farm assurance may not even be necessary, with many seeing its standards as ‘a means of control by the rest of the supply chain to undertake tasks which they often see as overly onerous and lacking in value’.

However, a similar percentage see the standards in a ‘more constructive manner’ – for example, as a way of obtaining a premium price for their products.

In an online survey, more than 50% of pig farmers agreed that farm assurance is an ‘essential requirement’ in UK farming, making it more supportive than all other sectors, bar horticulture (66%). Across all sectors, 42% agreed that farm assurance was essential, versus 45% who said it was not.

However, the review concluded, based on the evidence gathered, that the farm assurance system should be ‘retained, but improved’.

“Without a robust farm assurance system, there is a risk of damage to retailer and consumer confidence, and a prospect of further fragmentation in the determination of standards in UK farm products,” it said.

Recommendations

The review made nine strategic recommendations:

On-farm audits must be reduced, simplified and delivered more consistently

The biggest complaint from pig farmers about farm assurance is the inspection burden, particularly where RSPCA Assured and retailers are involved, as well as Red Tractor.

The report calls for additional cooperation between schemes to allow for multiple audits to be conducted at the same time, reducing duplication, and encourages ‘earned recognition’ between schemes, with reduced inspections for consistently compliant businesses.

Schemes are requested to adopt a risk-based approach to audit visits within six months, with a reduction in audit frequency for consistently compliant businesses within two years.

They are also urged to, within six months, ‘undertake a deep dive of existing standards to provide a publicly available plan setting out which will be removed, replaced or improved’.

A transformational step forward in embracing technology and managing data

This includes more use of remote assessments to reduce the ‘make-or-break nature of a periodic inspection’, helping to move to a culture where assurance is a ‘365-day-a-year rolling activity’ and assessments become ‘spot checks’ on that activity. This would also help reduce the impact of inspections on farmers’ mental health, the report noted.

Assurance schemes, working together, are urged to look into establishing a data co-op to share data across the private and public sector.

Farm assurance schemes need to reset and/or restate their decision-making structures to establish farmers as the driving voice in standards development

In some schemes, the report noted, there is an imbalance of power between the farming community and others involved in setting the standards – concerns pig farmers have voiced in the past.

“This needs to be addressed to improve the level of trust between these schemes and the farming community,” the report said.

Among the means of achieving this, it called for more transparency in appointments to sector boards.

An industry-led initiative must set out the future environmental ambitions for farm assurance, establishing this as an area of competitive advantage for UK farming

Addressing the aftermath of the GFC controversy, the report said there is ‘no escaping the fact that environmental standards in farming need to be improved and that farm assurance will need to take account of these developments, sooner rather than later’.

It stressed that farmers must be compensated for additional environmental work where environmental standards are ‘driven by other actors in the food chain to satisfy their public reporting requirements’.

With Red Tractor dropping its plans for a GFC and other schemes progressing their own initiatives, the report warned ‘there is no firm leadership around the issue of establishing a consistent framework for environmental standards’.

“This issue must, therefore, be taken out of the hands of the farm assurance system and addressed by farming representatives, working with the relevant regulators,” it said.

Red Tractor (RT) must complete the implementation of recommendations in last year’s Campbell Tickell report

The report observes that a ‘significant proportion of farmers and growers have lost confidence in the operations of RT’ and too many farmers feel the scheme is not ‘owned by them’, but rather ‘done to them’.

“While tensions arose publicly in relation to the GFC, our view is that this merely acted as the catalyst for issues to come to the surface,” it said.

However, it stressed that there is also ‘strong support for the scheme from many, notably in the pig sector’, and many farmers want it to be successful.

Nonetheless, it warns that, unless action is taken quickly to rebuild bridges with key sectors, the scheme faces an ‘existential threat’.

“Central to strengthening RT will be a board and senior executive team that recognise the scale of concern that exists and the urgency of action. We are concerned that is not the case,” the report stated.

The report described RT as ‘somewhat entrenched and defensive’, believing it has been ‘unfairly characterised, criticised and is broadly misunderstood’.

“While there will be examples to justify that view, the overwhelming call from our work is for a new leadership approach and culture,” it said.

Other recommendations

  • The inclusion of regulatory requirements within farm assurance standards and audits should be conditional on government and regulators agreeing a form of earned recognition.
  • There must be greater coordination in the way farm assurance operates across the UK nations.
  • Farm assurance schemes must better position the UK farming industry in world food markets and in competition with imported food. This includes greater clarity on the food production standards of importing food nations.
  • All schemes must review and, where necessary, improve their communication with the farming industry in light of the ‘perceived distance that has emerged between some schemes and their farming members’. The report noted that some schemes, including RT, are taking steps to renew their communications strategies.

Reaction

Dr Llewellyn said farm assurance must remain a critical part of farming’s future. “However, for that to happen, significant changes are needed to win back farmer confidence, to build on what already works well and to secure a competitive edge for UK farming on the world stage,” he said.

The RT board said it would ‘take time to fully digest and discuss the meaning of the review findings internally’, including incorporating feedback from its sector boards, and ‘respond in full once this process is complete’.

NPA chief executive Lizzie Wilson said the association looked forward to working with the schemes and others to ‘help deliver reforms that maintain the benefits of farm assurance, while making them fairer and more practical for producers’.

NFU president Tom Bradshaw and NFU Cymru president Aled Jones said they hoped the review ‘will provide a reset moment to enable farm assurance schemes to better deliver for the whole UK food supply chain and our customers’.

Share. LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Email
Previous ArticleMPs seek clarity from Defra over FMD response and Dover funding
Next Article Feral pigs illegally released in the Cairngorms captured and culled
Alistair Driver

Editor Pig World, group editor Agronomist and Arable Farmer and Farm Contractor. National Pig Association webmaster. Former political editor at Farmers Guardian. Occasional media pundit. Brought up on a Leicestershire farm. Works from a shed in his Oxfordshire garden.

Read Similar Stories

Red Tractor research highlights public backing for British food

June 19, 2025

Pigs Tomorrow: The sustainability challenges and trade-offs

June 13, 2025

Pigs Tomorrow: Ever-increasing knowledge informs future of farrowing

June 12, 2025
Latest News

Greater onus on farmers to justify autumn spreading, under revised FRfW guidance

June 20, 2025

Opportunity for pig farmers to take part in Just Farmers media workshops

June 20, 2025

Red Tractor research highlights public backing for British food

June 19, 2025
Sponsored Content

THE GATEKEEPER OF RESPIRATORY HEALTH – MYCOPLASMA HYOPNEUMONIAE (M.HYO)

April 30, 2024

Tackle the root cause of PWD with free diagnostic tests

March 1, 2024
Current Pig Industry jobs
  • Farrowing Manager

    • Suffolk
    • Blythburgh Pigs
    • Full Time
  • Pig Stockperson – Ref 1752 Somerset

    • Somerset
    • Roadhogs Recruitment Ltd.
    • Full Time
  • Senior Piggery Stockpersons – Ref 1751 Western Australia

    • Western Australia
    • Roadhogs Recruitment Ltd.
    • Full Time
GETTING IN TOUCH
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Meet The Editors
  • About Us
  • Email Newsletters
  • Subscribe
  • Reuse permissions
OUR SOCIAL CHANNELS
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
PARTNER EVENTS
RELATED SITES
  • Farmers Weekly
  • Agronomist & Arable Farmer
  • Farm Contractor
  • National Pig Awards
  • Pigs Tomorrow
  • Poultry News
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
© 2024 MA Agriculture Ltd, a Mark Allen Group company

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.