Pig World
  • News
      • Animal Health
      • Breeding
      • Business
      • Environment
      • EU
      • Food Safety
      • Housing
      • Marketing
      • NPA
      • National Pig Awards
      • New Products
      • Nutrition
      • People
      • Pig Fair
      • Politics
      • Training & Education
      • Welfare
  • Features
    • Animal Health
    • Breeding
    • Environment
    • Farm Visits
    • Herd Recording
    • Housing
    • Marketing
    • Nutrition
    • Products
    • Training
  • Comment
    • AHDB Pork
    • Chris Fogden
    • Dennis Bridgeford
    • Peter Crichton
    • Red Robin
    • Veterinary View
    • Zoe Davies, NPA
  • Numbers
  • Pig Prices
  • Magazines
    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • 2025 Buildings supplement
    • February 2025
    • 2025 Nutrition Supplement
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • National Pig Awards supplement
    • October 2024
    • September 2024
    • August 2024
    • 2024 Pig Health supplement
    • July 2024
    • June 2024
    • Innovation supplement 2024
    • Pig & Poultry Fair Guide 2024
    • May 2024
    • April 2024
    • Buildings Supplement
    • March 2024
    • Pig Nutrition (Beyond Zinc)
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • National Pig Awards Supplement 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • Health Supplement
  • Suppliers
  • Jobs
    • Browse Jobs
    • Post a Job
    • Manage Jobs
  • Classified
  • Events
    • Pigs Tomorrow
    • National Pig Awards
Podcast
Pig WorldPig World
  • News
      • Animal Health
      • Breeding
      • Business
      • Environment
      • EU
      • Food Safety
      • Housing
      • Marketing
      • NPA
      • National Pig Awards
      • New Products
      • Nutrition
      • People
      • Pig Fair
      • Politics
      • Training & Education
      • Welfare
  • Features
    • Animal Health
    • Breeding
    • Environment
    • Farm Visits
    • Herd Recording
    • Housing
    • Marketing
    • Nutrition
    • Products
    • Training
  • Comment
    • AHDB Pork
    • Chris Fogden
    • Dennis Bridgeford
    • Peter Crichton
    • Red Robin
    • Veterinary View
    • Zoe Davies, NPA
  • Numbers
  • Pig Prices
  • Magazines
    1. May 2025
    2. April 2025
    3. March 2025
    4. 2025 Buildings supplement
    5. February 2025
    6. 2025 Nutrition Supplement
    7. January 2025
    8. December 2024
    9. November 2024
    10. National Pig Awards supplement
    11. October 2024
    12. September 2024
    13. August 2024
    14. 2024 Pig Health supplement
    15. July 2024
    16. June 2024
    17. Innovation supplement 2024
    18. Pig & Poultry Fair Guide 2024
    19. May 2024
    20. April 2024
    21. Buildings Supplement
    22. March 2024
    23. Pig Nutrition (Beyond Zinc)
    24. February 2024
    25. January 2024
    26. December 2023
    27. November 2023
    28. National Pig Awards Supplement 2023
    29. October 2023
    30. September 2023
    31. Health Supplement
    Featured

    May 2025 issue of Pig World now available

    May 1, 2025
    Recent

    May 2025 issue of Pig World now available

    May 1, 2025

    April 2025 issue of Pig World now available

    April 4, 2025

    March 2025 issue of Pig World now available

    March 6, 2025
  • Suppliers
  • Jobs
    • Browse Jobs
    • Post a Job
    • Manage Jobs
  • Classified
  • Events
    • Pigs Tomorrow
    • National Pig Awards
LinkedIn X (Twitter)
Pig World
Breeding

Carry on culling

Angela CliffBy Angela CliffMay 27, 20154 Mins Read
LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Email

BPEX knowledge transfer manager Angela Cliff discusses the worrying trend of increased sow retention that’s emerged during the past 12 months

Producers should avoid the temptation to hang on to sows, despite low cull sow prices. Quite simply, if we’re to maintain a productive herd, we must ensure we maintain the optimum parity profile and not keep sows that should be culled.

The April 15 issue of BPEX’s Market Update said: “UK Sow and boar slaughterings were reportedly 2% back on last February, at 19,100 head. As cull sow prices continue to be poor, increased retention is likely as sow replacement becomes less economically attractive”.

There are some clear reasons to avoid retaining sows that should be culled. First, income from cull sows as a contribution to total unit income is very small. For an average unit, the maximum income from the sows is typically less than 2% of all sales. Your sows are worth more to you sold for less value, than retained in the hope their return will increase in a few months’ time.

For the reason behind this, consider which sows are probably retained. The likelihood is that sows of culling age with a reasonable lifetime performance will be kept for an extra parity. These older sows have an increased risk of pregnancy failure and stillbirths, while the litter has a greater variation in birth weights and higher percentage of smaller piglets. The sow has an increased feed maintenance requirement and possibly a reduced mothering ability due to her mature size.

The next group likely to be retained will probably be sows with consecutive poor litter sizes or numbers weaned, while finally those that have had multiple returns throughout their life, instead of the recommended one return per lifetime after their first parity, will get another chance. These aren’t exactly the building blocks for a high-performing unit!

Replacement rate
So, if you’re to maintain a sow replacement policy, what should your replacement rate be? A unit’s replacement rate will reflect the targeted culling age and level of fertility. To calculate the theoretical annual replacement rate, take the target number of litters per sow (for example, five parities); and unit farrowing index (2.33 litters/year); and calculate the whole herd turnover – that is 5.00 divided by 2.33 = 2.15 years. So the theoretical annual replacement rate will be 100% divided by 2.15 = 46.5% per year.

The higher the farrowing index and the lower the target litters per lifetime, the higher the theoretical replacement rate will be. The actual replacement rate will be a measure of the successful retention of introduced gilts to the target five parities. There will inevitably be both planned and unavoidable losses, and so a reasonable target is to have retained more than 70% of your initial gilt intake to at least parity four, ensuring that the percentage of sows between the most prolific parities, three to five, will be at least 45%.

Ultimately you don’t want your replacement rate to stray too far from the theoretical, but your first priority is to always have enough gilts to maintain the herd’s optimum parity profile of productive sows. Investigating the reasons for the higher replacement rate and possibly early culling of younger sows may identify strategic changes in the gilt management to help improve gilt and sow retention.

Gilts and their litters have their own set of challenges that require targeted management inputs to overcome. These were highlighted at last year’s Banff Pork Seminar:

  • every gilt introduced will typically have a reduced litter size for the next two parities compared to multiparous sows;
  • piglets from gilt litters are reported to be lighter at birth, which is reflected in their weaning weight and can contribute to a greater variation in the finishing herd;
  • the differences in performance of gilt progeny may be due to lower colostrum intake, poor transfer of colostral immunoglobulins and reduced concentration of immunoglobulins in milk; and
  • the indirect effects of high replacement rates mean that feed efficiency is reduced as increased proportions of gilt progeny enter the grow to finish groups.

The issue of gilt management and young sow retention is a specialist topic on which BPEX, to be rebranded AHDB Pork this month, will be focusing in the future.

Share. LinkedIn Facebook Twitter Email
Previous ArticleJune 2015: Eastern Europe’s pig sector gets back on track
Next Article June 2015: Danish conference turns the spotlight on castration
Angela Cliff

Read Similar Stories

Scientists behind PIC’s gene-editing PRRS resistant pigs hail ‘landmark’ US approval

May 1, 2025

PIC receives US approval for gene-edited PRRS-resistant pigs

April 30, 2025

PIC scientist calls for clear timetable on gene editing in livestock legislation

February 7, 2025
Latest News

UK livestock sectors urged to take part in survey on vaccine availability

May 14, 2025

APHA to use genomics to boost disease surveillance in £10m project

May 13, 2025

AHDB and Livetec join forces to stage ASF contingency planning workshops

May 12, 2025
Sponsored Content

THE GATEKEEPER OF RESPIRATORY HEALTH – MYCOPLASMA HYOPNEUMONIAE (M.HYO)

April 30, 2024

Tackle the root cause of PWD with free diagnostic tests

March 1, 2024
Current Pig Industry jobs
  • Pig Stockperson – Ref 1738 Co. Fermanagh

    • County Fermanagh
    • Roadhogs Recruitment Ltd.
    • Full Time
  • Pig Stockperson – Ref 1737 Shropshire

    • Shropshire
    • Roadhogs Recruitment Ltd.
    • Full Time
  • Managing Director

    • Oxfordshire and North Yorkshire
    • United Pig Co-operative (UPC)
GETTING IN TOUCH
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Meet The Editors
  • About Us
  • Email Newsletters
  • Subscribe
  • Reuse permissions
OUR SOCIAL CHANNELS
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
PARTNER EVENTS
RELATED SITES
  • Farmers Weekly
  • Agronomist & Arable Farmer
  • Farm Contractor
  • National Pig Awards
  • Pigs Tomorrow
  • Poultry News
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
© 2024 MA Agriculture Ltd, a Mark Allen Group company

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.