Consumers not acting on welfare concerns, research shows

Only one in five consumers count animal welfare as one of their top priorities when buying pork products, a major new piece of consumer research shows.

But the survey also revealed that animal welfare is a ‘background’ concern for many people, even if they rarely act on it.

The research, which involved nearly 2,000 consumers and included some in-depth interviews, was commissioned by Winterbotham Darby, which, based in Surrey, supplies ‘high quality foods’ across the EU. The research focused on Continental Meats, such as Parma ham, chorizo and salami, although the findings are relevant to all pork products.

Key findings included:

  • Only 22% of consumers cited welfare in their top five priorities when it came to buying Continental Meat products, and just 4% as their first priority
  • The top priorities were quality, (84% in top 5), price (79%) and taste (78%)
  • However, 52% have concerns about how the products they eat are produced, compared with 37% who don’t. These concerns were more prevalent among the A and B social grades, the over 45s and buyers of premium meat products
  • Most concerns around animal welfare are ‘non-specific’ and not often acted on
  • Asked who is most responsible for animal welfare, 72% said farmers, 56% Government, 47% retailers, 42% food companies and just 22% ‘the public’.

Winterbotham Darby technical director David Houghton cited research showing consumers are often aware of the ‘contradiction around meat consumption and animal welfare’ but choose to live with it, preferring to ‘avoid thinking about it’.

“Abdicating responsibility helps peace of mind,” he said. “There is an assumption that conditions or practices they might object to would not be allowed in the UK.”

Consumers are also selective about welfare purchases. For example, they are more likely to seek free range eggs than outdoor pork because of availability, a clear distinction in the packaging and a greater understanding of what they are buying and a ‘perception of quality’.

Screen Shot 2017-12-04 at 17.31.15The research suggested shoppers do not fully understand the meaning behind the various marks on meat. For example, while two-thirds of consumers were aware of the Red Tractor logo, only 35% had a clear idea of what it means. The figures were lower for the RSPCA Assured (61%, 31%) and Soil Association organic (49%, 23%) logos.

On specific welfare issues, consumers were asked to choose, from a list their main concerns. The top answer was pigs being kept in overcrowded or confined spaces (45%). The next highest was pigs being kept indoors their whole lives (20%), followed by sow stalls (13%), teeth clipping (3%), tail docking (2%) and castration (2%).

Mr Houghton said manufacturers and retailers had an opportunity to differentiate their brand and prompt consumers to ‘trade up’ by making animal a central plank of the ‘quality proposition’, although this will require clear and consistent labelling.

By not acting, they risked ‘being found out’ on welfare by customers or their competitors doing it first, he said.

About Winterbotham Darby

Winterbotham Darby has production sites in Spain and Italy and says it has prioritised ‘animal welfare and responsible sourcing’, for example, minimising confinement for sows, ‘pro-actively reducing’ castration, tail docking, teeth clipping/grinding and providing enriched environments and increased space. Its farms have won Compassion in World Farming EU pig welfare awards.

Get Our E-Newsletter - Pig World's best stories in your in-box twice a week
Will be used in accordance with our Privacy Policy
Share.

About The Author

Editor of Pig World and contributor to LBM’s other farming publications. Also National Pig Association webmaster. Formerly political editor at Farmers Guardian for many years. Enjoy a bit of media punditry. Brought up on a Leicestershire farm. Work from a shed in the garden in Oxfordshire. Under-9 football coach and big fan of Leicester City and Leicester Tigers. Occasional cricketer.